Page 213 - The-5th-MCAIT2021-eProceeding
P. 213

(1)
                                             ∑   ∈               
                                            (  ,   ) =
                                               |  |
                                          (  ,   ) =          ∈   (            )              (2)

           We employ the model-based CF method, namely the SVD algorithm, to generate the recommendations for
        the groups. Recommendation through GRSs represented as in (3) with    reference to the target group,    is a set
                                   )  and are utility functions for items        based on group members   .
        of available items                       (  ,      

                                                                                              (3)
                                                      (  ,   ) =                              (  ,       )
                                                    ∈   
        3. Result and Discussion

           As for experimental evaluation, we used the Movielens 1 Million (ML1M) dataset, which comprises 6040
        users  and  3952  movies  with  a  total  of  1,000,209  ratings.  DBpedia's  two  attributes  had  been  chosen:
        'dbo:director' and 'dbo:starring'. We employed 5-fold cross-validation over 15 formed groups and evaluated
        the GRS-LOD model's effectiveness using a consistent ten-size group (ten users per cluster).
           According to Table 1, the evaluation score for the GRS-LOD model outscored the baseline findings for both
        the MP and AV strategies. It appears that the GRS-LOD model is capable of improving prediction accuracy
        (Figure 3 (a)) as evidenced by the low RMSE and MAE errors, and also shows good recommendation relevancy
        (Figure  3  (b))  based  on  the  high  performance  of  the  Precision,  Recall  and  F1-Score  metric.  In  terms  of
        aggregation strategies, compared to MP, AV strategies performed better either as illustrated in Figure 3(a) and
        3(b).

        Table 1. Evaluation Score of Baseline and GRS-LOD Model
                                                     Baseline           GRS-LOD Model
                                                  MP        AV          MP       AV
                   Mean RMSE                     1.0246    0.9178      1.0141   0.8983
                   Mean MAE                      0.8266    0.7117      0.8108   0.6881
                   Precision (k=5, threshold=3.5)   0.9200   0.9333      0.9467   0.9600
                   Recall                        0.0497    0.0515      0.0576   0.0621
                   F1 Score                      0.0943    0.0976      0.1085   0.1167









        Fig. 3. (a) Prediction Accuracy Graph; (b) Recommendation Relevancy Graph

           These findings demonstrate that the proposed method facilitates effective group clustering implementation
        and emphasizes that additional rating data allows for more effective group recommendations since more data
        can identify user similarity. It underlines that the more similar the users in a group are, the more valuable the
        group's  recommendation  is  since  the  sparsity  being  reduced.  As  stated  by  Wang  et  al.  (2016),  generating
        effective recommendations is more onerous if a large number of data is not rated. Thus, highlighting the data
        insufficiency in the group profile is a significant practice in delivering quality and relevant recommendations







        E- Proceedings of The 5th International Multi-Conference on Artificial Intelligence Technology (MCAIT 2021)   [199]
        Artificial Intelligence in the 4th Industrial Revolution
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218